Lessons in Transition
"After the Rain - How the West Lost the East"
Here for Information about "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited"
READ THIS: Scroll down to review a complete list
of the articles - Click on the blue-coloured
Bookmark this Page - and SHARE IT with Others!
This material is copyrighted.
Free, unrestricted use is allowed on a non commercial basis.
The author's name and the address of this website must be incorporated in
any reproduction of the material for any use and by any means.
TO SEARCH THIS SITE, FOLLOW THESE STEPS :
1. Click here to find a specific word or subject: "Search My Site"
2. Click the blue-coloured
name of an article to reach a specific article
and then use your browser button to search for a specific word
|Join our mailing list!
Enter your email address below,
then click the 'Join List' button:
|Powered by ListBot|
Q: What have been the most successful approaches to attracting direct foreign investments: offering prospective investors tax breaks and similar benefits, or improving the overall investment climate of the country?
Empirical research has demonstrated that investors are not lured by tax breaks and monetary or fiscal investment incentives. They will take advantage of existing schemes (and ask for more, pitting one country against another). But these will never be the determining factors in their decision making. They are much more likely to be swayed by the level of protection of property rights, degree of corruption, transparency, state of the physical infrastructure, education and knowledge of foreign languages and “mission critical skills”, geographical position and proximity to markets and culture and mentality.
Q: What have been successful techniques for countries to improve their previously negative investment image?
The politicians of the country need to be seen to be transparently, non-corruptly encouraging business, liberalizing and protecting the property rights of investors. One real, transparent (for instance through international tender) privatization; one case where the government supported a foreigner against a local; one politician severely punished for corruption and nepotism; one fearless news medium – change a country’s image.
Q: Should there be restrictions on repatriation of foreign investment capital (such restrictions could prevent an investment panic, but at the same time they negatively affect investor's confidence)?
Short term and long term capital flows are two disparate
phenomena with very little in common. The former is speculative and technical
in nature and has very little to do with fundamental realities. The latter
is investment oriented and committed to the increasing of the welfare and
wealth of its new domicile. It is, therefore, wrong to talk about “global
capital flows”. There are investments (including even long term portfolio
investments and venture capital) – and there is speculative, “hot” money.
While “hot money” is very useful as a lubricant on the wheels of liquid
capital markets in rich countries – it can be destructive in less liquid,
immature economies or in economies in transition.
The two phenomena should be accorded a different treatment. While long term capital flows should be completely liberalized, encouraged and welcomed – the short term, “hot money” type should be controlled and even discouraged. The introduction of fiscally-oriented capital controls (as Chile has implemented) is one possibility. The less attractive Malaysian model springs to mind. It is less attractive because it penalizes both the short term and the long term financial players. But it is clear that an important and integral part of the new International Financial Architecture MUST be the control of speculative money in pursuit of ever higher yields. There is nothing inherently wrong with high yields – but the capital markets provide yields connected to economic depression and to price collapses through the mechanism of short selling and through the usage of certain derivatives. This aspect of things must be neutered or at least countered.
Q: What approach has been most useful in best serving the needs of small businesses: through private business support firms, business associations, or by government agencies?
It depends where. In Israel (until the beginning of the 90s), South Korea and Japan (until 1997) – the state provided the necessary direction and support. In the USA – the private sector invented its own enormously successful support structures (such as venture capital funds). The right approach depends on the characteristics of the country in question: how entrepreneurial are its citizens, how accessible are credits and microcredits to SMEs, how benign are the bankruptcy laws (which always reflect a social ethos), how good is its physical infrastructure, how educated are its citizens and so on.
Q: How might collective action problems among numerous and dispersed small and medium entrepreneurs best be dealt with?
It is a strange question to ask in the age of cross-Atlantic
transportation, telecommunication and computer networks (such as the Internet).
Geographical dispersion is absolutely irrelevant. The problem is in the
diverging self-interests of the various players. The more numerous they
are, the more niche-orientated, the smaller – the lesser the common denominator.
A proof of this fragmentation is the declining power of cartels – trade
unions, on the one hand and business trusts, monopolies and cartels, on
the other hand. The question is not whether this can be overcome but whether
it SHOULD be overcome. Such diversity of interests is the lifeblood of
the modern market economy which is based on conflicts and disagreements
as much as it is based on the ability to ultimately compromise and reach
What needs to be done centrally is public relations and education. People, politicians, big corporations need to be taught the value and advantages of small business, of entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship. And new ways to support this sector need to be constantly devised.
Q: How might access of small business to start-up capital and other resources best be facilitated?
The traditional banks all over the world failed at maintaining
the balancing act between risk and reward. The result was a mega shift
to the capital markets. Stock exchanges for trading the shares of small
and technology companies sprang all over the world (NASDAQ in the USA,
the former USM in London, the Neuemarkt in Germany and so on). Investment
and venture capital funds became the second most important source quantitatively.
They not only funded budding entrepreneurs but also coached them and saw
them through the excruciating and dangerous research and development phases.
But these are rich world solutions.
An important development is the invention of “third world solutions” such as microcredits granted to the agrarian or textile sectors, mainly to women and which involve the whole community.
Q: Women start one-third of new businesses in the region: now can this contribution to economic growth be further stimulated?
By providing them with the conditions to work and exercise
their entrepreneurial skills. By establishing day care centres for their
children. By providing microcredits (women have proven to be inordinately
reliable borrowers). By giving them tax credits. By allowing or encouraging
flexitime or part time work or work from home. By recognizing the home
as the domicile of business (especially through the appropriate tax laws).
By equalizing their legal rights and their pay. By protecting them from
sexual or gender harassment.